Early on in the
semester, we looked at the poem To the
Pale Poets by Ray Durem. The message let the readers know that literature
should be direct and powerful, truly reflecting the nature of whatever is being
discussed. Specific to African-American subject matter for poetry, Durem
expresses the need for honest wording to really show that “Blood is blood and
murder’s murder.” The poem is addressed to the “pale poets” because Durem
doesn’t appreciate the watery messages dressed up with flowery language. He
challenges these said poets to “Come on with your effervescent jive explain to
him why he ain’t alive” (referring to a dead black boy). I think he is right to
say that literature should be strong and non-evasive, after all, isn’t the point
of literature to make a social argument? And what is an argument if it is not
confident enough to potentially stand against opposing opinion? We read this
poem after a few days discussion on Native
Son, so it made me wonder – how does Wright successfully make the problems presented
in his novel clear and public enough?
It is
justifiable to say that Native Son is
a protest novel, and the arguments Wright puts forth are both numerous and
strong. The core event/content Wright uses – the messy murder of a white girl –
is pretty much set up to be shocking. So even at face value it is agreeable
that Wright is not holding back, in fact the only thing he refrains from is
being “pale” in his novel. Then, looking at the different themes that Wright
intertwines, it is plain that the novel is extremely direct and confrontational
about discussed issues.
There are plenty
of critiques that he provides in Native
Son, but the most frequent and possible important theme that I glean is
that of Bigger’s limited options and almost predetermined life situations. By
simply looking at his tight living conditions and family financial status, the
picture is not positive. He has little to work with and ultimately has nowhere
to go but crime and aggression. With all of the general pressure on his life
from being poor and oppressed going to his friends and making trouble is what
he is funneled into doing. The event of the actual murder was also something
that society norms pushed him towards. Think about it: if Bigger was a white
man, there would never have been a murder. First off, the uncomfortable
interactions would not have occurred in the car and at the restaurant.
Secondly, when Bigger was dropping off Mary in her room, he would not really
have had to been so desperate to hide himself from Mrs. Dalton if he were white.
Being murdered by a pillow is not exactly normal, and such an extraordinary situation
only happened because society placed restrictions on Bigger. It seems like
Wright was making it so out of the ordinary that he was proving the point that
the murder would not have happened if Bigger were white.
Another large
protest Wright is making is directed towards the corruption of the justice
system. In Book III we see a lot of the internal struggle Bigger has every time
he reads a newspaper describing how he raped Mary which is not true. The media
makes too many assumptions based on racism, and this is unfortunately what the court
uses to speed up the process. To be fair, the media should not have a real
effect in the decision making, but the skewed system allows it to move the
people and therefore the process. A specific issue within the justice system is
the fact that a decision has already been made before the trial. Max actually
makes legitimate points when defending Bigger, but nobody listens, not the
judge, jury, or Buckley. Bigger himself actually thinks several times of how he
would rather just have the officials shoot him then go through the entire process,
and this is because he knows that everything is over before it starts.
One of the very
first images Wright provides for us is Bigger and Buddy working to rid their
living space of a nauseatingly large rat. The analogy of the rat trying to
survive translates to Bigger struggling to catch a breath of a free life. The themes,
events, and issues Wright brings to the table for discussion make this overall
message clear, and I think Durem would agree that Wright is nowhere near being
considered as “pale.”
Not only in terms of content but in terms of style, I think Durem would hold up Wright as an example of direct, frank, unadorned prose--for some readers, his depictions are *too* graphic, and there is a confrontational quality to the way he compels his readers to really feel and smell the squalid stuff he depicts. A defender of realism would say that such gory detail is necessary to make Bigger's struggle real to the reader. There's also the alarm clock opening the novel--a sense that this all is happening *now*, that Bigger's story is ripped from the current headlines. There's no sense of art as a refined, abstract category of experience: for Wright, art should force us to confront ugly realities.
ReplyDelete